3 Jul 2026

Polling Data Reveals Public Support Levels for Tax Adjustments on Adult Gaming Centres

High street adult gaming centre exterior with slot machines visible through windows

The Social Market Foundation released findings from its recent poll indicating that 43 percent of the public backs a Labour government decision to raise taxes on adult gaming centres and casinos, and those numbers come directly from surveys conducted ahead of potential policy shifts in the gambling sector.

Details Behind the Proposed Duty Increase

Under the outlined plan machine games duty would double from its current 20 percent rate to 40 percent, and this adjustment targets Category B £2 slot machines found in adult gaming centres along with casinos while leaving lower-stakes machines in pubs untouched. The change follows a period of record takings across the sector, with current collections from machine games duty already reaching approximately £600 million each year.

Calculations presented alongside the polling suggest that the doubled rate could deliver additional annual revenue between £275 million and £458 million from those same Category B machines, which in turn would push the overall total generated from this source to around £460 million more than present levels. Observers note that the timing aligns with ongoing discussions about fiscal measures available to address gambling-related concerns.

Political Figures and Potential Policy Directions

Reports reference Andy Burnham in connection with these matters, noting that if he were to assume the role of prime minister he might move forward with actions focused on gambling, yet the proposed tax measures specifically spare pub-based machines from any similar increase. The Social Market Foundation polling therefore provides one data point for policymakers considering how public opinion might factor into such choices.

Revenue Figures and Sector Performance Context

Current machine games duty collections stand at roughly £600 million annually, and the projected uplift from the rate change would layer substantial new amounts on top of that base. Data compiled for the report breaks down the expected gains into the £275 million to £458 million range depending on how machine usage and operator responses unfold after implementation.

Those who've examined the numbers point out that the sector has posted record takings in recent periods, which supplies part of the backdrop for why the duty adjustment surfaces now. The distinction drawn between adult gaming centres, casinos, and pubs remains consistent across the released materials, with only the higher-stakes Category B machines in the former venues facing the proposed hike.

Interior view of casino floor showing rows of gaming machines and players

How the Polling Fits Into Broader Discussions

The 43 percent support figure emerges from the Social Market Foundation survey, and it sits alongside the revenue projections without any accompanying commentary on overall public sentiment beyond that single measure. June 2026 marks the period when these findings became public, setting the stage for any follow-up conversations that might occur as July progresses and fiscal planning continues.

Figures from the report tie the potential new revenue directly to Category B £2 slot machines, and the unchanged treatment of pub machines forms a deliberate boundary within the proposal. Those studying the sector note that record takings provide the immediate context, yet the polling itself stands as an isolated snapshot rather than a comprehensive view of attitudes toward gambling taxation in general.

Implementation Considerations Outlined in the Materials

Should the duty move to 40 percent, operators of adult gaming centres and casinos would face the adjusted rate on their Category B machines, while the lower-stakes offerings in pubs continue under existing rules. The estimated additional yield of £275 million to £458 million per year would accumulate on top of the existing £600 million baseline, producing the combined increase approaching £460 million annually that the analysis describes.

Data released with the polling does not extend to forecasts of behavioral changes among players or operators, yet it does isolate the mechanical effect of the rate doubling on the specified machine category. The Guardian report covering these developments supplies further background on the timing and the figures involved.

Conclusion

The Social Market Foundation polling and accompanying revenue calculations present one set of facts for consideration around tax policy on adult gaming centres and casinos. With 43 percent public support indicated for the proposed increase, the doubling of machine games duty from 20 percent to 40 percent on Category B £2 slots stands projected to add between £275 million and £458 million each year beyond the current £600 million collection level. The measures leave pub machines unaffected, and references to possible future action by figures such as Andy Burnham appear within the same reporting window of late June 2026. These elements together form the core of the released information without extension into wider industry impacts or subsequent developments.